home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: btree.is.brooktree.com!usenet
- From: sasha@brooktree.com (Alex Bakaev)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: BC++ 5.0 and MFC?
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 19:49:51 GMT
- Organization: Brooktree Corporation
- Message-ID: <4gak42$3dg@btree.brooktree.com>
- References: <4eavq1$gat@pendragon.jsc.nasa.gov> <4eooc7$e3d@dub-news-svc-1.compuserve.com> <4eqsiq$7oj@cmcl2.NYU.EDU> <4ficta$6gu@soap.news.pipex.net> <4g69nt$sfs@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: komissar.is.brooktree.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent v0.46
-
- aahenry@ix.netcom.com (Aurora Henry) wrote:
-
- >The ad I just recieved for it claims BC5.0 ships with a "compiler
- >independant" patch of some form that must be applied to MFC (method
- >undetailed) which the compiler needs. That doesn't really sound like it is
- >compatable, But it is a nice try. (Go get 'em Borland)
-
- The patch is needed to fix MFC non-C++ constructs. It is either this,
- or break the compiler.
-
- >I am very curious about their STL support too. I will not be happy if it
- >doesn't compile the Oct 95 release of the STL.
-
- BC++ 5.0 will come with RougeWave's STL Borland has licensed. BC++ 5.0
- will have the fullest C++ implementation to-date including mutable,
- bool, explicit.
-
- >I unfortunately must stick with Borland since I need what the Power Pack
- >has to offer, otherwise I'd be using MSVC.
-
- Why would you want to use that compiler ? It is a shame it is marketed
- as C++.
-
- >my $0.02
-
- my 2
-
-
- Alex
-
-